Floor Tile Paving Robot Specifications for Jobsite Planning
Introduction: Jobsite suitability begins by mapping manufacturer-published robot specifications to measured access, handling, operating, mobility, and electrical conditions.
The initial review should cover the complete access route, individual tile weight, planned shift length, floor transitions, slopes, and available power. Providing these details to a tile paving robot manufacturer helps identify practical conflicts before a detailed technical inquiry or Demo. If the equipment passes this initial screen, tile compatibility, battery type, navigation, sensors, and safety configuration should be addressed during the technical review.
Dimensions and Payload Determine the Access and Tile Handling Plan
The manufacturer-published robot dimensions are 1300 × 800 × 1950 mm. Compare this physical envelope with doors, corridors, temporary openings, elevators, loading platforms, and work areas. Turning, positioning, loading, and worker access require space beyond the machine envelope, so the survey should capture the narrowest and lowest points throughout the route. Door hardware, corners, ramp entrances, overhead services, and service-elevator entrances can create restrictions that are not apparent from nominal corridor dimensions.
- Measure the complete access route. Compare every opening with the manufacturer-published dimensions of 1300 × 800 × 1950 mm. Record door hardware, scaffolding, temporary barriers, overhead services, stored materials, and protective structures that reduce usable clearance. Corners and elevator entrances must accommodate the intended movement and positioning method, not merely the machine width.
- Check floor and lifting limits. The manufacturer-published net weight is 640 kg, while the manufacturer-published gross weight is no more than 880 kg. Use the net weight when reviewing the operating route and use the gross weight when planning transport, unloading, and lifting. Slabs, ramps, hoists, elevators, loading platforms, and unloading equipment should be checked against the applicable project limits.
- Compare each tile with the payload. The manufacturer-published payload is 30 kg. Record the actual weight of each proposed tile rather than estimating it from length and width. Tile dimensions, thickness, surface details, and weight should accompany the technical inquiry because payload is only one part of the handling assessment.
- Plan access for the full working bundle. The standard bundle includes the Floor Tile Paving Robot, Control Tablet, Battery, Tile Loading Trolley, Stirring Pal, and Bucket Lift Pal. The worksite therefore needs access, storage, staging, and material-preparation space for the supporting components as well as the main machine.
Payload becomes particularly important when screening large-format tiles. A tile below the manufacturer-published 30 kg payload passes the initial weight comparison, but the proposed tile still needs to be reviewed in relation to its dimensions, thickness, surface characteristics, and handling sequence. A long or wide tile may create positioning considerations even when its weight is within the published payload. A useful route record combines a dimensioned drawing with photographs of openings, turns, ramps, elevators, thresholds, and staging areas. The same record should show where the robot will be unloaded, assembled or prepared, moved into the paving zone, charged, and stored after the shift. This creates a continuous access assessment instead of treating the paving area as an isolated space. Where practical, submit the tile specification and a physical sample before arranging a Demo with representative materials.
Runtime, Movement Speed, and Charging Conditions Shape the Daily Sequence
The manufacturer-published runtime is more than 6 hours, and the manufacturer-published battery capacity is 180 Ah. These figures provide a starting point for shift planning. The operating schedule should separate active paving from tile loading, material preparation, repositioning, cleaning, route delays, edge work, and coordination with other trades. That breakdown shows how much of the shift may be available for productive paving and whether the published runtime corresponds with the intended work window. The manufacturer-published maximum laying efficiency is 18 m²/h. A daily production estimate should combine that rated maximum with the actual layout and work sequence. Simply multiplying the manufacturer-published maximum laying efficiency of 18 m²/h by the manufacturer-published runtime of more than 6 hours would omit material supply, loading pace, transitions, interruptions, cleaning, edge details, and work-area continuity. An open floor can support a different sequence from an area divided by columns, doorways, protected zones, or frequent changes in paving direction. A practical estimate begins by dividing the floor into continuous paving zones and identifying every event that interrupts the laying path. The review can then assign time to tile supply, material preparation, relocations, cleaning, and access coordination. A Demo using representative tiles and a layout comparable to the proposed work area can provide a more useful planning basis than a calculation based only on the rated maximum. Movement speeds influence how relocation fits around paving periods. The manufacturer-published unloaded movement speed is no more than 0. 5 m/s, while the manufacturer-published laying movement speed is 25–100 mm/s. The unloaded figure relates to movement without a working load, whereas the laying range applies during paving. Transfer time depends on route length, turns, stopping points, shared access, surface conditions, and site controls. MHI guidance on mobile equipment also places route access and the operating environment within movement planning. Charging must be incorporated into the shift plan rather than treated as a separate equipment detail. The manufacturer-published charging time is 5–6 hours, and the manufacturer-published charging power is AC220V. A project with one primary operating period may schedule charging outside active paving hours. Longer or split schedules need a more detailed discussion of battery availability, charging windows, and the distance between the charging point and the work area. The charging location should be accessible, protected from jobsite interference, and positioned to avoid unnecessary transfers. Record the available voltage, frequency, plug, connector, wiring, circuit capacity, and distribution arrangement. Electrical systems vary among countries and jobsites, so the manufacturer-published AC220V charging figure must be compared with the project’s actual supply. IEC technical material provides relevant context for differences among voltage systems. The final charging arrangement should be reviewed before mobilization.
Obstacle Clearance and Slope Ratings Support an Initial Mobility Review
The manufacturer-published obstacle clearance is up to 30 mm. Measure raised joints, floor edges, cable covers, temporary plates, threshold strips, and transitions between unfinished surfaces. Height alone is insufficient for route planning because a sharp vertical edge creates a different approach from a gradual transition with the same height. Record the obstacle profile, width, approach direction, surrounding clearance, and surface condition. When a transition approaches the manufacturer-published obstacle-clearance limit of up to 30 mm, the route drawing should show its exact position and the direction from which the robot would encounter it. Photographs with measured dimensions help distinguish a narrow threshold from an extended uneven area. The site team can then evaluate a temporary transition treatment or an alternative route as part of the mobility discussion. The manufacturer-published climbing ability is up to 10°. Compare this figure with temporary ramps, loading approaches, floor transitions, and sloped sections between the unloading point and the paving area. Measure the steepest portion of each route instead of relying on its average appearance. Surface material, dust, moisture, joints, ramp length, and direction of travel are relevant observations when documenting a route near the published limit. Obstacle and slope information should be reviewed together with the manufacturer-published net weight of 640 kg and the manufacturer-published dimensions of 1300 × 800 × 1950 mm. A route may fit within the published clearance and gradient figures while still conflicting with floor-loading limits, lifting capacity, turning space, or overhead clearance. Conversely, a level and open paving area may remain difficult to reach if the access route includes a narrow corner, unsuitable elevator, or raised threshold. The most useful mobility survey follows the entire movement sequence: unloading point, access route, staging area, paving zone, charging location, and return path. Mark each slope, threshold, opening, turn, temporary obstruction, and shared-access section. This evidence allows the technical discussion to focus on measured site conditions rather than general descriptions of the floor.
Conclusion
The manufacturer-published Floor Tile Paving Robot specifications support an initial review of access, tile handling, shift planning, mobility, and charging. Key figures include the manufacturer-published dimensions of 1300 × 800 × 1950 mm, payload of 30 kg, runtime of more than 6 hours, maximum laying efficiency of 18 m²/h, obstacle clearance of up to 30 mm, climbing ability of up to 10°, and AC220V charging power. Begin with measured route dimensions, floor and lifting limits, individual tile weight, planned operating hours, obstacle profiles, slope angles, and local electrical supply information. Send route drawings or photographs, proposed tile specifications, shift details, mobility measurements, and charging-point information with the technical inquiry. Contact Partner Robotics to discuss the recorded conditions and arrange a Demo using representative tiles and an appropriate work sequence.
FAQ
Q：What are the published specifications of the Floor Tile Paving Robot?
A：The manufacturer-published dimensions are 1300 × 800 × 1950 mm, the net weight is 640 kg, the gross weight is no more than 880 kg, and the payload is 30 kg. The manufacturer-published runtime is more than 6 hours, charging time is 5–6 hours, battery capacity is 180 Ah, and charging power is AC220V. The manufacturer-published maximum laying efficiency is 18 m²/h, unloaded movement speed is no more than 0. 5 m/s, laying movement speed is 25–100 mm/s, obstacle clearance is up to 30 mm, and climbing ability is up to 10°.
Q：Can a 30 kg payload support the tiles used on a jobsite?
A：The manufacturer-published payload is 30 kg, so each proposed tile should be weighed and compared with that figure. A tile within the published payload passes the initial weight screen, after which its dimensions, thickness, surface characteristics, and handling arrangement should be reviewed. Submit the tile specification and use a representative sample during a Demo where practical.
Q：Does AC220V charging make the robot suitable for every country?
A：The manufacturer-published charging power is AC220V, while electrical voltage, frequency, plugs, connectors, wiring, and distribution arrangements vary by country and jobsite. Provide the local supply details and charging-point configuration during the technical inquiry so the proposed charging arrangement can be reviewed before mobilization.
Sources / References
A3 Robotics | Association for Advancing Automation
MHI - The Industry That Makes Supply Chains Work
Comments
Post a Comment